> Again we can observe a similar trend, with the latest GPT-5 already astonishingly close to human performance: Yes but only if you measure "performance" as "b

> Again we can observe a similar trend, with the latest GPT-5 already astonishingly close to human performance: Yes but only if you measure "performance" as "better than the other option more than 50% of the time" which is a terrible way to measure performance, especially for bullshitting AI. Imagine comparing chocolate brands. One is tastier than the other one 60% of the time. Clear winner right? Yeah except it's also deadly poisonous 5% of the time. Still tastier on average though!