3 ms·
Maybe SSH/3 instead (SSH + HTTP/3)?
by theandrewbailey 1y ago
Maybe SSH/3 instead (SSH + HTTP/3)?
- techscruggs 1y agoI like this idea! Having SSH in the name helps developers quickly understand the problem domain it improves upon.
- bingabingabinga 1y ago[dead]
- throwaway127482 1y agoDoesn't /3 mean v3? I mean, for HTTP itself, doesn't the HTTP/3 == HTTPv3? If so, I don't see how this is any better than SSH3 - both SSH3 and SSH/3 read to me like "SSH v3"
- theandrewbailey 1y agoYes, but HTTP is about the only thing that versions with a slash. By writing it SSH/3, it would emphasize its relationship with HTTP/3, instead of it being the third version of SSH.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- Dylan16807 1y ago> Doesn't /3 mean v3? I've seen very little do that. Probably just HTTP, and it's using a slash specifically to emphasize a big change.