4 ms·
They could've OEM'd the lamp, for example, from Phillips. And a tiny-factor WiFi gadgets is hardly a rocket science, products like EyeFi has been around for sev
by huhtenberg 14y ago
They could've OEM'd the lamp, for example, from Phillips. And a tiny-factor WiFi gadgets is hardly a rocket science, products like EyeFi has been around for several years. There's really nothing in the project that screams what you say it does.
[0] http://www.eye.fi http://www.eye.fi
- raverbashing 14y agoI reread their product description and I still stand by my opinion And even the article says (and they agree it's an OEM lamp): "The Lifx is priced at $49 per bulb, which means that you’re basically buying a basic WeMo switch and getting the LED bulb — and all the technology merging the two into one bulb-sized piece of hardware — for free. It just doesn’t seem likely." They can prove me wrong, sure, by shipping the product.
- Dylan16807 14y agoYeah? So? The article is being disingenuous by picking a bulky and very high-priced wifi product.
- raverbashing 14y agoBecause surely a smaller and more complex device is going to cost less than a WeMo, sure It is not overpriced if you factor the cost of electronic control of the lamp
- Dylan16807 14y agoDid you not see the earlier link of a full computer with wifi crammed into an SD card for less price? WeMo is not a good cheap benchmark. Heck, I could dissect a router and glue on a relay in a smaller package for under fifty.
- raverbashing 14y agoThe EyeFi? Yes, I saw it. Cheapest one is 39.99, let's take $5 for the 'SD' part, so it's $35 "Heck, I could dissect a router and glue on a relay in a smaller package for under fifty" Cheapest WeMo is $50 so you're almost there already You can try to have a homemade solution for less, sure but you'll have a small price advantage and maybe not follow all standards relating to switches (isolation, etc, it will work, though). Not counting the software work. Now, for their lamp they would need 3 power channels, instead of one 'on-off' control, which is certainly more expensive and complex.
- Dylan16807 14y agoYou're not going to take off anything for the overelaborate processor and the fact that it's smaller than we need for the light? And by under fifty I didn't mean barely. Here, look, miniature wifi for 8 dollars retail http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833180092 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833180... The wifi component of this is not the expensive part. LEDs, LED power supply, and heatsink are going to be most of the price. This is not a fifty dollar wifi device with a free light. This is a thirty dollar light with a ten dollar wifi device slipped in.
- veemjeem 14y agoI'm curious how their device might be configured. The eyefi includes a usb dongle that require you to use a computer to configure the wifi settings with. They could do something like the electric imp where you configure it via sending it data via light. I don't think this is as easy as you make it sound -- there are definitely engineering challenges to make it easy for the end user.
- adunk 14y agoMany of these embeddeded wifi devices start in a mode where they act as a wifi hotspot/access point, with a pre-defined password. One connects to the hotspot with a smartphone and opens a web browser, which provides a simple web UI that offers a way to select a wifi network to use as well as the password. The device then reboots into the new wifi network. A bit cumbersome, but certainly doable. (Not necessarily something people would like to do for every lightbulb in their home though.)