4 ms·

Just connect everything folks, we'll proactively read everything, all the time, and you'll be a 10x human, trust us friends, just connect everything...

by neom 1y ago

datadrivenangel 1y ago
AI SYSTEM perfect size for put data in to secure! inside very secure and useful data will be useful put data in AI System. Put data in AI System. no problems ever in AI Syste because good Shape and Support for data integration weak of big data. AI system yes a place for a data put data in AI System can trust Sam Altman for giveing good love to data. friend AI. [0] 0 - https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/186312312148/luritto-cornerof5thandvermouth https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/186312312148/luritto...
- jrmg 1y ago
  Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen!
  - oaxacaoaxaca 1y ago
    Perfect use of that line lol
- delichon 1y ago
  Bad grammar is now a trust signal, this might work.
yeasku 1y ago
Just one more connection bro, I promise bro, just one more connection and we will get AGI.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
randomNumber7 1y ago
When smartphones came I first said "I don't buy the camera and microphone that spy on me from my own money." Now you would be really a weirdo to not have one since enough people gave in for small convenience to make it basically mandatory.
- wholinator2 1y ago
  To be fair, "small convenience" is extremely reductive. The sum of human knowledge and instant communication with anyone anywhere the size of a graham cracker in your pocket is godlike power that anyone at any point in history would've rightly recognized as such
  - lomase 1y ago
    Mobile phones changed society in a way that not even Internet did. And they call it a "small conveninece".
- someguyiguess 1y ago
  You’re conflating the phone and camera with the actual data collection. So that’s not a good argument
unshavedyak 1y ago
Honestly that's a lot of what i wanted locally. Purely local, of course. My thought is that if something (local! lol) monitored my cams, mics, instant messages, web searching, etc - then it could track context throughout the day. If it has context, i can speak to it more naturally and it can more naturally link stuff together, further enriching the data. Eg if i search for a site, it can link it to what i was working on at the time, the github branch i was on, areas of files i was working on, etcetc. Sounds sexy to me, but obviously such a massive breach of trust/security that it would require fullly local execution. Hell it's such a security risk that i debate if it's even worth it at all, since if you store this you now have a honeypot which tracks everything you do, say, search for, etc. With great power.. i guess.
tshaddox 1y ago
The privacy concerns are obviously valid, but at least it's actually plausible that me giving them access to this data will enable some useful benefits to me. It's not like some slot machine app requesting access to my contacts.
jstummbillig 1y ago
The biggest companies with actual dense valuable information pay for MS Teams, Google Workspace or Slack to shepherd their information. This naturally works because those companies are not very interested in being known to be not secure or trustworthy (if they were other companies would not pay for their services), which means they are probably a lot better at keeping the average persons' information safe over long periods of time than that person will ever be. Very rich people buy life from other peoples to manage their information to have more of their life to do other things. Not so rich people can now increasingly employ AI for next to nothing to lengthen their net life and that's actually amazing.
- infinitezest 1y ago
  The downside is that we're funneling our money and information to a very small number of people. As the imbalance grows, there is less and less reason for the rich people to give a shit about what the not so rich people think or want for their lives. Short term, woo hoo. Long term, not great.
  - jstummbillig 1y ago
    I agree that it feels wrong, but I am increasingly unconvinced that it's a problem (or at least: I don't know what the problem exactly is). Life around the world keeps improving on most every metric, while all these mega corps keep growing. I am not saying they are the reason this is happening, or that it would be even better without them — I don't know in either case. What makes me suspicious: Is there a certain number on their balance sheets at which the system turns sour, when the trap snaps? Because the numbers all seem absurdly large already and keep increasing. Am I to believe that it will all come down after the next trillion or 10? I mean, it's not unthinkable of course, I just don't know why. Even from the most cynical view: Why would they want to crash a system where everything is going great for them? So I do wonder: Are large amounts of wealth in the hands of a few per se a real world problem for us or is our notion of what the number means, what it does to or for us, simply off?
    - anonbuddy 1y ago
creata 1y ago
I might be projecting, but I think most users of ChatGPT are less interested in "being a 10x human", and more interested in having a facsimile of human connection without any of the attendant vulnerability.
- rchaud 1y ago
  ...or don't want to pay for Cliff's Notes.
qoez 1y ago
And if you don't we're implicitly gonna suggest you'll be outcompeted by people who do connect everything
- henry2023 1y ago
  Data driven living is 10x Non data driven living is 1x Therefore data driven beings will outcompete Same reasoning shows that 3.10 is better than 3.1
  - kilpikaarna 1y ago
    E = mc^2 + AI
qiine 1y ago
you are joking but I kinda want that.. except private, self hosted and open source.
TZubiri 1y ago
The proverbial jark has been shumped
ElijahLynn 1y ago
Google already has this data for their AI system...
Rodmine 1y ago
And specially important to connect your personal data to a company which most likely murdered a whistle-blower: https://youtu.be/RkKp8GkfpX4 https://youtu.be/RkKp8GkfpX4
- someguyiguess 1y ago
  That’s what I’m saying! I’m not trusting Sam Altman with ANY of my data. He makes Zuckerberg look like a sane, reasonable guy in comparison.

Just connect everything folks, we'll proactively read everything, all the time, and you'll be a 10x human, trust us friends, just connect everything...

by neom 1y ago

Just connect everything folks, we'll proactively read everything, all the time, and you'll be a 10x human, trust us friends, just connect everything...

datadrivenangel 1y ago

AI SYSTEM perfect size for put data in to secure! inside very secure and useful data will be useful put data in AI System. Put data in AI System. no problems ever in AI Syste because good Shape and Support for data integration weak of big data. AI system yes a place for a data put data in AI System can trust Sam Altman for giveing good love to data. friend AI. [0] 0 - https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/186312312148/luritto-cornerof5thandvermouth https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/186312312148/luritto...

jrmg 1y ago
Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen!
- oaxacaoaxaca 1y ago
  Perfect use of that line lol
delichon 1y ago
Bad grammar is now a trust signal, this might work.

yeasku 1y ago

Just one more connection bro, I promise bro, just one more connection and we will get AGI.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

randomNumber7 1y ago

When smartphones came I first said "I don't buy the camera and microphone that spy on me from my own money." Now you would be really a weirdo to not have one since enough people gave in for small convenience to make it basically mandatory.

wholinator2 1y ago
To be fair, "small convenience" is extremely reductive. The sum of human knowledge and instant communication with anyone anywhere the size of a graham cracker in your pocket is godlike power that anyone at any point in history would've rightly recognized as such
- lomase 1y ago
  Mobile phones changed society in a way that not even Internet did. And they call it a "small conveninece".
someguyiguess 1y ago
You’re conflating the phone and camera with the actual data collection. So that’s not a good argument

unshavedyak 1y ago

Honestly that's a lot of what i wanted locally. Purely local, of course. My thought is that if something (local! lol) monitored my cams, mics, instant messages, web searching, etc - then it could track context throughout the day. If it has context, i can speak to it more naturally and it can more naturally link stuff together, further enriching the data. Eg if i search for a site, it can link it to what i was working on at the time, the github branch i was on, areas of files i was working on, etcetc. Sounds sexy to me, but obviously such a massive breach of trust/security that it would require fullly local execution. Hell it's such a security risk that i debate if it's even worth it at all, since if you store this you now have a honeypot which tracks everything you do, say, search for, etc. With great power.. i guess.

tshaddox 1y ago

The privacy concerns are obviously valid, but at least it's actually plausible that me giving them access to this data will enable some useful benefits to me. It's not like some slot machine app requesting access to my contacts.

jstummbillig 1y ago

The biggest companies with actual dense valuable information pay for MS Teams, Google Workspace or Slack to shepherd their information. This naturally works because those companies are not very interested in being known to be not secure or trustworthy (if they were other companies would not pay for their services), which means they are probably a lot better at keeping the average persons' information safe over long periods of time than that person will ever be. Very rich people buy life from other peoples to manage their information to have more of their life to do other things. Not so rich people can now increasingly employ AI for next to nothing to lengthen their net life and that's actually amazing.

infinitezest 1y ago
The downside is that we're funneling our money and information to a very small number of people. As the imbalance grows, there is less and less reason for the rich people to give a shit about what the not so rich people think or want for their lives. Short term, woo hoo. Long term, not great.
- jstummbillig 1y ago
  I agree that it feels wrong, but I am increasingly unconvinced that it's a problem (or at least: I don't know what the problem exactly is). Life around the world keeps improving on most every metric, while all these mega corps keep growing. I am not saying they are the reason this is happening, or that it would be even better without them — I don't know in either case. What makes me suspicious: Is there a certain number on their balance sheets at which the system turns sour, when the trap snaps? Because the numbers all seem absurdly large already and keep increasing. Am I to believe that it will all come down after the next trillion or 10? I mean, it's not unthinkable of course, I just don't know why. Even from the most cynical view: Why would they want to crash a system where everything is going great for them? So I do wonder: Are large amounts of wealth in the hands of a few per se a real world problem for us or is our notion of what the number means, what it does to or for us, simply off?
  - anonbuddy 1y ago

creata 1y ago

I might be projecting, but I think most users of ChatGPT are less interested in "being a 10x human", and more interested in having a facsimile of human connection without any of the attendant vulnerability.

rchaud 1y ago
...or don't want to pay for Cliff's Notes.

qoez 1y ago

And if you don't we're implicitly gonna suggest you'll be outcompeted by people who do connect everything

henry2023 1y ago
Data driven living is 10x Non data driven living is 1x Therefore data driven beings will outcompete Same reasoning shows that 3.10 is better than 3.1
- kilpikaarna 1y ago
  E = mc^2 + AI

qiine 1y ago

you are joking but I kinda want that.. except private, self hosted and open source.

TZubiri 1y ago

The proverbial jark has been shumped

ElijahLynn 1y ago

Google already has this data for their AI system...

Rodmine 1y ago

And specially important to connect your personal data to a company which most likely murdered a whistle-blower: https://youtu.be/RkKp8GkfpX4 https://youtu.be/RkKp8GkfpX4

someguyiguess 1y ago
That’s what I’m saying! I’m not trusting Sam Altman with ANY of my data. He makes Zuckerberg look like a sane, reasonable guy in comparison.