4 ms·

There are studies regarding that: almost half of S&P 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children https://www.brookings.edu/articles/almost-half-o

• deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
• nwienert 1y ago
  This doesn’t really tell us much, and isn’t really relevant to H1B either. If we had 0 immigration, all S&P 500 companies would be founded by non-immigrants.
  • outworlder 1y ago
    Not really. Companies would still be founded, but there's no way to tell if they would ever grow to the point that would be listed in the S&P 500.
    • nwienert 1y ago
      Not sure if you don’t know how they define the S&P, or straw-manning.
  • estebarb 1y ago
    That is half true. It also would be a USA without Apple, Nvidia, Google, Tesla, Intel, Qualcomm, Yahoo, Paypal, eBay, Pfizer, P&G, Goldman Sachs...
    • deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]
  • dalyons 1y ago
    This is a useless “technically correct” rejoinder. Yes, the top 500 would by definition still have 500 companies in it. Yes, the net value of the s&p would almost certainly be lower without the innovation brought by immigrant founders. Which is obviously the point being made.
    • nwienert 1y ago
      H1B started in the 90s, when the economy was at all time highs, and since then growth has been less impressive. It is your comment in fact that decided to assume I missed the point, while assuming something that’s almost certainly not easy to assume.
• h1bnotfound 1y ago
  [dead]
• l___l 1y ago
  The Fortune Global 500 Companies might be a better list. 139 US companies made the list in 2025 which is 27.8%. https://us500.com/fortune-global-500 https://us500.com/fortune-global-500