4 ms·
I personally draw inspiration from John Carmack. I've understood his approach to be basically just stare at your problem and ignore everything else until you ma
by piker 1y ago
I personally draw inspiration from John Carmack. I've understood his approach to be basically just stare at your problem and ignore everything else until you make a little bit of progress. The answer is there.
- terabytest 1y agoSounds like a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. My main issue is to even get myself to sit and stare at the work to be done. It has been really frustrating seeing the lengths I go to, consciously or unconsciously, to procrastinate.
- koakuma-chan 1y agoI used to work a non tech office job, one day it became so unbearable, I was literally falling asleep and was no longer able to bring myself to do the job at all, because of how much mental effort was required for even the smallest things. I stood up and quit.
- RangerScience 1y agoWhat’d you do after that?
- koakuma-chan 1y agoEndured condemnation from others while simultaneously looking for a proper tech job, took me 8 months to find.
- ljlolel 1y agoWhat was the job?
- koakuma-chan 1y agoData entry
- SoftTalker 1y agoI once had a job where I would sit in my car in the parking lot for 30 minutes every morning just mustering the will to walk into the office.
- siva7 1y agoYou're not alone.
- idiotsecant 1y agoBeen there. Man, that's a rough place to be.
- marginalia_nu 1y agoI think it's mostly about accepting that you are the one in control. The problem of "getting yourself to do something" is poorly formulated, as though some other person was in charge of your actions that you have to convince to do what you want. This confused conviction is the real problem. There is no other you to convince. The same you that you are bargaining with to do the thing is the same you that's doing the bargaining. You can at any moment just do it.
- zanellato19 1y agoThat's really nice but not really true. There is another you that you need to convince to do boring stuff. That's our own body fighting against doing that stuff. Will is a finite resource.
- geeB 1y agoThat is by far the best approach… if you can do it. If your mind already works that way, you might not appreciate how much of a superpower you have.
- bobcorponoi 1y agoThat's interesting, I'll have to look into that and give it a try. Seems like a good way to build back up your attention span as well.
- emil-lp 1y agoThis is the Procrastination version of Feynman's problem solving technique. Write down the problem. Think really hard. Write down the solution.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- IncreasePosts 1y agoCarmack also has an insane net worth and has the freedom to pick and choose the problems he stares at, and set the time tables for a solution. I wouldn't suggest this method if you're some random mid-level programmer.
- dysoco 1y agoNot to say he's unproductive, because he's a beast, but I don't think he's a good example. Carmack got to work on really cool things which he loved (games) most of which were in his own company so he also had a stake on that. Afterwards he had money to work on other stuff he was passionate about (rockets, VR, etc.) in his own terms. It's much harder to draw motivation to meaningless work.
- jimbokun 1y agoI think this only works if you have difficult and interesting problems to work on.
- clickety_clack 1y agoIs there a quote or source for this? I want to use it in a talk.
- piker 1y agoSorry I was looking for a transcript, but if you have 5 hours to listen you'll find it in here: https://lexfridman.com/john-carmack/ https://lexfridman.com/john-carmack/. It's an awesome interview if you haven't heard it anyway.
- layer8 1y agoThe issue is if even thinking about staring at the problem is already giving you PTSD. If I’m at a point where staring at the problem is fine, there isn’t much of an issue to begin with.