3 ms·
It is dangerous for RADV which already has its own issues. And when you look at AMDVLK, you don't want those devs anywhere near RADV.
by sylware 1y ago
It is dangerous for RADV which already has its own issues. And when you look at AMDVLK, you don't want those devs anywhere near RADV.
- vrighter 1y agocould you elaborate on those issues? genuinely curious
- sylware 1y ago[dead]
- sylware 1y agoBTW, some forgot one of the C preprocessor features was to handle simple namespaces (for "One-Compilation-Unit"). That to avoid symbol colision. Some will say it is really painful to deal with, and I can tell those are liers since I did it: in reality you have very rarely symbol colisions, namely you can code without thinking about it, only to tag the public identifiers with a comment to deal with it once the code settled down.