3 ms·
No counter evidence is needed because Hersh hasn't actually presented any legitimate evidence in the first place.
by nradov 1y ago
No counter evidence is needed because Hersh hasn't actually presented any legitimate evidence in the first place.
- normalaccess 1y agoIf 'no counter-evidence is needed' were valid, we could dismiss anything we don't like without argument. AKA: Argument from ignorance