5 ms·
Says a lot that the very first person listed on that 'charliesmurders.com' site isn't condemning or mocking Kirk at all but just expressing anxiety about the l
by anigbrowl 1y ago
Says a lot that the very first person listed on that 'charliesmurders.com' site isn't condemning or mocking Kirk at all but just expressing anxiety about the likelihood of a political backlash following his death. Even the people on 4chan were expressing confusion about this and saying her remarks seemed wholly innocuous.
- MilnerRoute 1y agoAre you saying they're just harassing people they don't like?
- seanmcdirmid 1y agoThey were looking for targets to make examples of and didn't vet their targets very carefully.
- LocalH 1y agoThe point is anything less than expressions of mourning is considered "violent rhetoric" by the same right-wingers who were radio silent when Melissa Hortman was murdered, and who made jokes when Paul Pelosi was bludgeoned with a hammer.
- lisbbb 1y ago[flagged]
- LocalH 1y agoJust like Kirk was murdered by a left-winger because they made groyper references that most of the world doesn't get, while 4chan laughs because they know what's up >_> Hortman was murdered by an anti-abortion loonie with a Republican history.
- TrnsltLife 1y agoSilence is violence, right? I thought that was the lesson we were supposed to have learned.
- nilsherzig 1y agoBuilding websites which only work on the "www" subdomain should also be a crime.
- croes 1y agoDefamation sites? Is that Kirk‘s legacy. Must be that American Christian values I heard about