3 ms·
If Apple and Meta have had to pay $38 million for engaging in these practices I don't understand why they used the subtle "chronically-online" dig against peopl
by add-sub-mul-div 1y ago
If Apple and Meta have had to pay $38 million for engaging in these practices I don't understand why they used the subtle "chronically-online" dig against people trying to expose it:
"And this has given rise to a cottage industry of chronically-online types — in other words, typical tech workers — seeking to expose them."
- kstrauser 1y agoWhat the… Yeah, I’m with you on that one. “We would’ve gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for those meddling chronically onlines seeing if we’re obeying federal law!”
- pavel_lishin 1y agoThe whole thing seems to oddly disdainful of the people being impacted: > How many 20-something software engineers even know how to use a post office in 2025?
- supjeff 1y agoI feel like there was a lot of nonsense ideas for what is such a short, and supposedly journalistically rigorous article
- 1121redblackgo 1y agoThe Hill stays afloat by laundering political operative and rat-fucking articles. Politico to a lesser extent, but similar. Read those two sites with suspicion. Always.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]