4 ms·
> financial privacy is an important part of having a functioning democracy No, I don't think it is. Perhaps privacy for speech and voting are.
by user34283 1y ago
> financial privacy is an important part of having a functioning democracy
No, I don't think it is. Perhaps privacy for speech and voting are.
- ozozozd 1y agoHow is privacy for voting different than privacy for funding the candidate?
- vkou 1y agoOne man one vote is a little different from one dollar one word, or one dollar one vote. In most civilized countries you have privacy in the voting booth (because without it, buying votes becomes trivial), but no privacy in financing campaigns. Some of those countries even have rules about when campaigns can and cannot run, because there are benefits to living in a society that's not actively bombarded by polarizing political screeching 24/7. It does some to cut down the influence of dollars in politics. I guess it makes people in the advertising business, and people looking to buy political influence very unhappy.
- realo 1y agoHeinous speech is allowed in the USA but is totally illegal in Canada. I live in Canada. Anonymous heinous speech? No thank you. Go away.
- Ylpertnodi 1y ago>> financial privacy is an important part of having a functioning democracy >No, I don't think it is. Perhaps privacy for speech and voting are. Cash works for financial privacy, and functioning democracies.