4 ms·
Google Ends Support for Lynx Browser
Accessing google.com in Lynx now shows:
Google
Update your browser
Your browser isn't supported anymore. To continue your search, upgrade to a recent version. [Learn more]
- stefanos82 1y agoSeems like elinks is affected too...bummer!
- ryao 1y agoI wonder to what extent visually disabled internet users are affected by this, since I can imagine at least some of them using lynx with an on-screen reader for a terminal emulator.
- bitpush 1y agoWhat's the advantage of using lynx as opposed to Chrome/Safari and using the read aloud features?
- ryao 1y agoAsk someone who is visually impaired. I know that they historically use browsers that do not support JavaScript. I also am acquainted with one developer who uses software for reading his terminal outloud, although I never asked the specifics of what he uses for web browsing or IRC for that matter. I do know that he loves the iPhone. That said, I just found this post by a blind person who uses Lynx and complained about it the last time Google broke Lynx support: https://blind.guru/blog/2019-11-25-endofgoogle.html https://blind.guru/blog/2019-11-25-endofgoogle.html
- tdeck 1y agoThat may have been true decades ago but I think this is pretty marginal these days. All the Blind people I have talked to use mainstream browsers. GUI browsers actually provide more metadata to screen readers than something like Lynx can, and they actually work with websites people need to access.
- duskwuff 1y agoNot to any meaningful degree. Lynx (or other terminal-based browsers) would be an extraordinarily poor choice of browser for a non-sighted user, as it lays text out visually in the terminal (e.g. using color and indentation to distinguish between types of text) and does not provide accessibility cues. Those users are much better served by standard GUI web browsers.
- LargoLasskhyfv 1y agoIs Google exempted from the ADA?
- bitpush 1y agoSafari offers https://www.apple.com/accessibility/ https://www.apple.com/accessibility/ features, so I'm pretty sure someone with visual disability can access google no issues.
- LargoLasskhyfv 1y agoSeriously? Apple only? But Linux! And *BSD! Or some Illumos. Or in general just some effin textmode terminal, running whatever is able to run Lynx/Links/Elinks(2?).
- tdeck 1y agoOn Linux you use Orca with your browser of choice. On Windows you use JAWS or NVDA with your browser of choice. All major browsers support screen readers.
- ChrisArchitect 1y agoSuggest changing title to something along lines of "Tell HN: Accessing google in lynx now shows unsupported" Maybe, like in 2019 when a similar submission got traction, you'll be able to get it restored. (I am no longer able to use Google with Lynx https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21626995 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21626995)
- userbinator 1y agoTry asking the Google employee there directly if you can.
- ChrisArchitect 1y agoRelated discussion earlier this year: Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42747092 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42747092
- TorstenK 1y agoWhen resources are an issue, this does matter. I use to store previous Lynx/ Links search results in history lists, to allow browsing within local files later. Creating such lists with Firefox is a mess. (This browser tends to block my Thinpad for hours.) Really sad. Google was a key to the internet. Torsten
- samtheDamned 1y agomaybe this is a knee-jerk reaction but I don't see any good reason for this. At it's core Google's job is to take an input and list outputs. The marketshare of people using lynx is small enough that whatever advertising or ai extras they want to squeeze in won't be meaningfully impacted by not working on lynx. Edit: corrected spelling error
- pachouli-please 1y agoGoogle's job is to sell ads, not provide accessibility to text-only browsers. (for the record I grow to dislike g more every day, and also this move)
- codedokode 1y agoInternet marketers can misuse this to send lot of automated requests instead of paying for API access.
- bdhcuidbebe 1y agoLol, what? Anyone can spoof UA…
- codedokode 1y agoStandard Google page can use JS and WASM to fingerprint device and detect bots. No-JS page cannot detect bots so it makes sense to shut it down to prevent using it for bot detection bypass.
- bdhcuidbebe 1y agoThat is besides the point. I can spoof UA today with lynx, curl or what ever that isnt executing js. See topic.
- salted-fry 1y agoI just tested changing user agents in Chrome - setting UA to a random string like "fff" gets a search page, but setting it to "Links" or "Lynx" gets "Your browser isn't supported anymore" - which is to say, this doesn't look accidental, but more like these UAs are specifically being blocked. EDIT: Forging user agent in Links (with links -http.fake-user-agent) gets a usable homepage, but the results page just sends you to a turn-on-your-javascript page.
- extraduder_ire 1y agoMy impression is that support for less common browsers and other unusual uses of google products has survived due to pet interest by individual googlers and not any sort of widespread policy.
- kn0where 1y agoA lot of those individual googlers are longtimers who are now leaving after 15, 20 years. Google has been offering voluntary exit packages this year and I suspect the kind of people who would value Google.com working in Lynx are also the type who have made plenty of money and are disillusioned by what the company has become.
- eimrine 1y agoGoogle loves to search the result with a real URL but since I make any click on that result Google replaces it with some referral link. For example, if I want to open the result not from my connection but from Tor I need to clean each link by hand or even type it from scratch. I am sure this ban was made for poisoning UX for console guys too. What a pity I didn't know I could search from console browser and having more easy life.
- Elfener 1y agoThis extension removes that behaviour: https://github.com/Rob--W/dont-track-me-google https://github.com/Rob--W/dont-track-me-google
- teejmya 1y agoTry http://frogfind.com/ http://frogfind.com/
- benbristow 1y agoServer error
- userbinator 1y agoI wonder if an Invidious or Nitter-like solution will be coming soon, as no doubt me and countless others, although still a minority, are now truly motivated to do something about it. These bastards have truly ruined what's left of the open Internet. Google, FUCK YOU!
- gh02t 1y agoFor search, you mean? SearXNG has been around for a while and is excellent. I have used it for years as my main search. Not sure if it supports lynx but a least they don't arbitrarily block it.
- bdhcuidbebe 1y agoYou wonder… Just google it. https://search.sethforprivacy.com/ https://search.sethforprivacy.com/ How do kids today even survive online?
- userbinator 1y agoJust google it. You might want to take a look at the context.
- bdhcuidbebe 1y agoAnd you need to calibrate your humor ;-)
- horseradish7k 1y ago4get is pretty decent
- RAM-bunctious 1y agoI don't feel it's particularly controversial to think that Javascript shouldn't be a requirement to use the internet. This is one step towards making that the case.
- rgreekguy 1y agoFrom a normal browser (don't ask me what I mean by that), with its normal/default user agent, Google search does not work without Javascript. I think at all, any more, but at some point I had got rate limited of sorts, after using the search without Javascript for a little, I got a prompt to enable it.
- mklbz 1y ago[dead]
- anon1395 1y agoSeems like they are cracking down on people who use Google without JavaScript.
- maltelandwehr 1y agoThis is more about requiring JavaScript that blocking specific browsers. I think all the new LLM labs (plus all the tools offering SEO services for LLM-based search and answer engines) finally reached a limit of scraping that Google no longer can sustain.
- flaptrap 1y agoThe most efficient way to search is to read the text. Waiting for images to download and then admire them cannot improve that. It looks like Google has lost relevance and is telling us, again.
- hulitu 1y ago> The most efficient way to search is to read the text. "Maybe for you" > Waiting for images to download and then admire them cannot improve that. "It does improve the way we track you" > It looks like Google has lost relevance and is telling us, again. They just got patted on the back by regulators in US so they don't give a fsck.
- hieloz 1y agowhoogle search is affected now.
- SnuffBox 1y agoI noticed this the other day as I (previously) used an old Firefox UA to get a more simple, streamlined legacy interface. I don't know why they did this.
- xacky 1y agoInternet Explorer versions below 11 are getting the message too. Impacting those who use legacy Windows versions.
- d--b 1y agoyet another use for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45181535 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45181535