3 ms·
Indeed. I, for one, would be in favor of turning hurricane zones into national parks, eminent-domaining those properties for 90% of cost, and federally (or stat
by shadowgovt 1y ago
Indeed. I, for one, would be in favor of turning hurricane zones into national parks, eminent-domaining those properties for 90% of cost, and federally (or state with federal funding) facilitating moving those families inland.
It won't be painless, but it'll be less painful than letting the market try to solve it and telling them "Good luck selling your stick-pile when everyone knows it's not safe to live here anymore!"
- dylan604 1y ago> moving those families inland. Inland from the coast of Florida is a swamp. Is that really any better? I know the orange man is a fan of draining swamps, but I'm pretty sure that's not what was meant. People don't live in deserts. People just need to accept that the opposite of no water can be just as in hospitable
- jmclnx 1y agoI would agree, but there is one issue. Where will people move, without a huge amount of homes being built, where will they move to ? If the move, even with their current insurance rate, their payments/rent will probably cost much more then they are paying now. Especially if their home is paid off.
- nemomarx 1y agoWe should get a huge amount of homes being built for other reasons tbh