3 ms·
There is also a semantic-based CSS that is overwhelmingly smaller than this one: https://newcss.net/ https://newcss.net/ And I think this is so minimal
by kozika 1y ago
There is also a semantic-based CSS that is overwhelmingly smaller than this one:
https://newcss.net/ https://newcss.net/
And I think this is so minimal
- bdn_ 1y agoNew.css developer here, thanks for sharing :) I’ve been thinking about creating a CSS tool somewhere about halfway between new.css and Pico CSS for very basic page layout tools (containers, callouts, menu bars, etc) that still focuses on being extremely small and performant. I feel that a tool like that would be helpful for laying out a simple but functional site (sourcehut’s site [1] comes to mind) where you need a few basic layout tools but don’t need all of Bootstrap. [1]: https://sourcehut.org/ https://sourcehut.org/
- codazoda 1y agoI’d love to see NeatCSS on your list. It’s not officially classless but I try to make it semantic as much as possible. I bookmarked you GitHub repo (which you should link on the page if I didn’t miss it). I’ll give it a try myself to see if it works (and maybe make adjustments).
- sroerick 1y agoI think this would be excellent. There's a whole class of websites /landing pages which right now Astro seems to be filling that niche. It's mind boggling how hard it is to do basic components on the web
- vehemenz 1y agoTailwind is semantic too because the class names say what they do.
- imiric 1y agoThat's not what semantic means.
- user____name 1y agoStop arguing semantics!