3 ms·

> it works for human drivers Sure, for some definition of "works"... https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/yearly-snapshot https://ww

> it works for human drivers Sure, for some definition of "works"... https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/yearly-snapshot https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/deta...

Rohansi 1y ago
Vision is almost certainly not the main issue with humans as drivers.
- NaomiLehman 1y ago
  it's one of the reasons.
  - Rohansi 1y ago
    For sure, but my phone camera sees better than I do. Cars can make use of better camera sensors and have more than two of them. You can't just extrapolate the conclusion that human vision bad = vision sensors bad.
    - NaomiLehman 1y ago
      we can't conclude that LIDAR is better than a camera? Is it worth cutting the costs? LIDAR has everything that a camera has plus more.
    - shpx 1y ago
      Cameras are nowhere near the fidelity and responsiveness of human eyes.