3 ms·
>Can you name any other company that if they owned Chrome it would've been better for the users and the web? Mozilla? Red Hat? Valve?
by lawlessone 1y ago
>Can you name any other company that if they owned Chrome it would've been better for the users and the web?
Mozilla? Red Hat? Valve?
- bitpush 1y agoMozilla already owns a browser, and gets free money from Google to do that. Yet, they have been mismanaging the whole time. What makes you think they'll suddenly do a good job when the funding goes away, and they have to now support a large userbase which pays $0 to use the product.
- NekkoDroid 1y ago> Mozilla? Already has a browser. With debatable success. > Red Hat? Would probably rather end up under the Linux Foundation and not RH. How development would then continue is up for debate. > Valve? They already use CEF for their Steam client IIRC, but I don't think they are too much interested in owning an entire browser. Especially considering Valve itself is a relatively small company emplyee wise.
- LunaSea 1y agoMozilla would immediately go bankrupt because Google wouldn't have to sponsor them anymore. Red Hat has been acquired and is already well underway on the enshitification road. Browsers are way too far from Valve's core business.