> I just don't understand what's wrong with 6⋅N⋅D or 6ND I think most people that read this would be confused and try to find out why there are some undisclose

> I just don't understand what's wrong with 6⋅N⋅D or 6ND I think most people that read this would be confused and try to find out why there are some undisclosed vectorial operations applied to what looks like scalar numbers. And yeah, mathematical notation is ugly and confusing. But the fix is not as simple as you think it is. Apropos CQRS, it's a marketing name. It's hard to understand on purpose. Actual CS-made names tend to be easier.