3 ms·
No it was a paraphrase of the report and cited no sources that disagreed. It simply sneakily misrepresented the contents and buried the links to the actual repo
by skrtskrt 1y ago
No it was a paraphrase of the report and cited no sources that disagreed. It simply sneakily misrepresented the contents and buried the links to the actual report.
- mike_hearn 1y agoThen yes, that's very bad.