It's not snark. The survey uses the term "unemployed" but it is a different metric than the "unemployed" metric. >But let’s take the second part of your rebutt

It's not snark. The survey uses the term "unemployed" but it is a different metric than the "unemployed" metric. >But let’s take the second part of your rebuttal - that the results may be skewed towards younger people who still live at home. Are we in an argument? I wasnt really rebutting anything. I was clarifying my original comment. Even after the clarification that it's not apples to apples, the intersection of 69% living in a home and 37% being unemployed is pretty striking. >If your assessment is correct, then the correct reaction should be panic and fear over what that might mean for the wider economy, not belittling the demographic Where am I belittling anyone?