3 ms·
> The information is available for now.... OK, so you're speculating. And quoting Howard (the guy violating the copyright) is irrelevant. It's not a trick to
by timr 1y ago
> The information is available for now....
OK, so you're speculating.
And quoting Howard (the guy violating the copyright) is irrelevant. It's not a trick to defend your copyright. If he set up a channel of nothing but old Simpsons clips to "preserve" them, YouTube would take those down, too.
- NewJazz 1y agoYes, all archivers speculate that the original source of information will at some point become unavailable. On a long time horizon, they have often been correct.
- timr 1y agoOK, so you're speculating.
- ceejayoz 1y agoSure, in the same sense you're speculating that they don't have a time machine to prove their point. Not all speculation is of equal value.
- timr 1y ago> Sure, in the same sense you're speculating that they don't have a time machine to prove their point. That's called: I'm stating a current fact, and you're imagining a future that doesn't exist.
- ceejayoz 1y agoNo, you're speculating that the parent poster can't prove it with their time machine. That is a reasonable form of speculation. As was the parent poster's speculation.