4 ms·
I’m not opposed to paying, but I see two issues: 1. I could read a newspaper without a subscription. I could buy just one issue. NYT does that that online 2.
by MBCook 1y ago
I’m not opposed to paying, but I see two issues:
1. I could read a newspaper without a subscription. I could buy just one issue. NYT does that that online
2. A newspaper in a vending machine showed you more than just the headline. Like the subhead, for example. I can’t even see that. The default NYT experience without a subscription gives you only the title. And I have to agree to $25/month to get anything else assuming I’m not using a paywall bypass
“We have stuff, we say you’ll like it, cough up a bunch of money to find out what” is a tough sell for me.
Paywalls that give you at least the first few sentences make far more sense to me.
- sdeer 1y agoRight now when I went to their front page I could see a one paragraph summary of several news items. Granted, other front page stories only show the headline but I think that is an adequate substitute for what we got from peeking at the vending machine window.
- MBCook 1y agoI’d agree. Oddly, if you’re direct linked to the article you don’t get it though. So I guess I could go find the story on their homepage and see it there. That’s a rather odd workflow.