And they can say no to the government with the equity stake and the government can divest. I'm not arguing they are exactly the same... I just think the author

And they can say no to the government with the equity stake and the government can divest. I'm not arguing they are exactly the same... I just think the author shouldn't state the hypothesis at the end of the article without examining it. Frankly I think it's a good summary of why Intel may be too big to fail. It's just framed wrong.