3 ms·
I definitely think running agents in sandboxes is the way to go. That said Claude code does not have free reign to run commands out of the gate.
by kasey_junk 1y ago
I definitely think running agents in sandboxes is the way to go.
That said Claude code does not have free reign to run commands out of the gate.
- sneak 1y agoYes it does; you are thinking of agent tool calls. The software package itself runs as your uid and can do anything you can do (except on macOS where reading of certain directories is individually gated).
- otterley 1y agoClaude Code is an agent. It will not call any tools or commands without your prior consent. Edit: unless you pass it an override like --dangerously-skip-permissions, as this malware does. https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/supply-chain-security-alert-popular-nx-build-system-package-compromised-with-data-stealing-malware https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/supply-chain-security-alert...
- kasey_junk 1y agoOk, but that’s true of _any_ program you install so isn’t interesting. I don’t think the current agent tool call permission model is _right_ but it exists, so saying by default it will freely run those calls is less true of agents than other programs you might run.
- sneak 1y agoNot all programs misbehave in this way. Signal desktop lets you turn off this vulnerability, and of course iOS apps and normal macOS apps are not allowed to self-modify, as it breaks their signature. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Desktop/issues/4578 https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Desktop/issues/4578 https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-macos/issues/122 https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-macos/issues/122
- fwip 1y agoPet peeve - it's free rein, not free reign. It's a horse riding metaphor.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 1y agoBah, well I have been using that incorrectly my entire life. A monarchy/ruler metaphor seems just as logical.
- woollysammoth 1y agoThere's a term "eggcorns" for these logical misinterpretations - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggcorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggcorn