This article says its steel-manning the equity stake but its actually an argument for Intel being "too big to fail" and then conflating that with an equity stak

This article says its steel-manning the equity stake but its actually an argument for Intel being "too big to fail" and then conflating that with an equity stake. I do find his argument for Intel being "too big to fail" compelling, for whatever it's worth. But it was kind of surprising to only see 1 sentence at the end claiming the equity stake is necessary. I thought we were actually going to get an analysis on the deal and the dynamic it would create.