5 ms·
I thought only Samsung and LG are producing OLED panels right now? Prices are getting affordable, so IPS/VA is going to be more of a obsolete tech in a few year
by corimaith 1y ago
I thought only Samsung and LG are producing OLED panels right now? Prices are getting affordable, so IPS/VA is going to be more of a obsolete tech in a few years.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- alephnerd 1y agoLCDs (IPS and VA) still represent over 70% of the global display market. Cars, refrigerators, toys, etc all still use LCD displays. OLED is still overwhelmingly Samsung and LG, but OLED demand only represents around 5-7% of total display demand.
- FirmwareBurner 1y ago>OLED is still overwhelmingly Samsung and LG Have you heard of BOE?
- alephnerd 1y agoYes. But they are still in the 10-15% range today for OLED market share, and their access to external markets is limited due to their IP infringement on Samsung. The recent ruling Samsung got from the US ITC is similar to litigation they are conducting globally against BOE.
- okasaki 1y agoOLEDs have many drawbacks that make them a no-go. They're dim, have bad text rendering, use a lot of power, and get permanent burn in on static UIs. In return you get "deep blacks". But photographers have been raising black levels since forever because it turns out it makes pictures more pleasant. So, uh.
- ryao 1y agoI have never seen bad text rendering on an OLED. Which ones have you seen that have bad text rendering? I recently replaced a Sony X900E with a LG C4. Text is crisp and power usage dropped going to the OLED. Permanent burn-in will happen with static images, but it happened on CRTs too and those once dominated the world. As long as it is infrequent, it is probably not much of an issue. Newer OLEDs, such as Apple’s tandem OLEDs, minimize the issue. I am not sure what you think your point about black levels contributes to the discussion. Higher black levels would only favor OLEDs thanks to their inky blacks.
- okasaki 1y agoI mean you can just google this. It's common knowledge, I'm not dropping some hot new research here.
- gucci-on-fleek 1y agoOLED displays don't inherently have poor text rendering, but they tend to use more exotic subpixel layouts than LCD displays [0]. It's possible to render text well with alternative subpixel layouts (for example, every iPhone), but if you use the standard RGB/BGR algorithm with PenTile displays, you're going to get bad results (but with a high enough resolution, it doesn't really make much of a difference). [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PenTile_matrix_family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PenTile_matrix_family
- eatsyourtacos 1y agoDim?? I'm getting a sunburn from my OLED at the moment.
- okasaki 1y agoYes, OLEDs are notably dim compared to eg the cheaper mini-led displays. That's why OLED displays aren't recommended for environments with ambient light like windows or mandatory lighting.
- catigula 1y agoMini-led technology is quickly outpacing OLED technology. It's going the way of plasma in a decade or less.
- ryao 1y agoHow? OLED is still the gold standard while MiniLED is a rebrand of full array local dimming LCDs where the zone count is somewhat higher than past models. MicroLED is the true replacement for both. I do not see how MiniLED is on track to outpace anything.
- catigula 1y agoI'm just referring to smaller and smaller LEDs, I don't really care about the marketing terms really. Whatever technology you want to call sufficiently small LEDs, how you market it isn't relevant to me. Pixel-LEDs are the goal.
- corimaith 1y agomicro-led monitors are going by 5 figures right now, thats definetly not a consumer or even enthuasist market by 2028.