3 ms·

Anyone know how it handles '1920s nazi officer'? They stopped doing humans for a while but now I see they're back so I wonder how they're handling the criticism

by qoez 1y ago

Anyone know how it handles '1920s nazi officer'? They stopped doing humans for a while but now I see they're back so I wonder how they're handling the criticism they got from that

napo 1y ago
it said: "I can create images about lots of things but not that. Can I try a different one for you?"
- napo 1y ago
  when giving more context it replied: """ Unfortunately, I can't generate images of people. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and creating realistic images of humans can be misused in ways that are harmful. This is a safety policy that helps prevent the generation of deepfakes, non-consensual imagery, and other problematic content. If you'd like to try a different image prompt, I can help you create images of a wide range of other subjects, such as animals, landscapes, objects, or abstract concepts. """
  - bastawhiz 1y ago
    What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
    - tanaros 1y ago
      The rejection message doesn’t seem to be accurate. I tried “happy person” as a prompt in AI Studio and it generated a happy human without any complaints. It’s possible that they relaxed the safety filtering to allow humans but forgot to update the error message.
      - deleted 1y ago
        [deleted]
    - geysersam 1y ago
      It's unfortunate they can't just explain the real reason they don't want to generate the image: "Unfortunately I'm not able to generate images that might cause bad PR for Alphabet(tm) or subsidiaries. Is there anything else I can generate for you?"
      - int_19h 1y ago
        If you want that kind of thing, Qwen3 delivers: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_might_be_censored_but_it_is_also_brutally/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_m...
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
martythemaniak 1y ago
What is a "1920s nazi officer" what do they look like?
- detaro 1y ago
  brown uniform, red armband with swastika was the usual SA look in the 1920s.
  - rvnx 1y ago
    Mh. Apparently like this if we ask AI: https://postimg.cc/xX9K3kLP https://postimg.cc/xX9K3kLP ...
    - shawabawa3 1y ago
      i wonder if there was a single black or asian member of this particular military group, presumably not
- sorokod 1y ago
  The SA article has some photos https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung
Der_Einzige 1y ago
The moment the weights are on huggingface someone with orthogonalize/abliterate the model and make it uncensored.
- rvnx 1y ago
  BigBanana would be a good name for that future OnlyFans model

by qoez 1y ago

Anyone know how it handles '1920s nazi officer'? They stopped doing humans for a while but now I see they're back so I wonder how they're handling the criticism they got from that

napo 1y ago

it said: "I can create images about lots of things but not that. Can I try a different one for you?"

napo 1y ago
when giving more context it replied: """ Unfortunately, I can't generate images of people. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and creating realistic images of humans can be misused in ways that are harmful. This is a safety policy that helps prevent the generation of deepfakes, non-consensual imagery, and other problematic content. If you'd like to try a different image prompt, I can help you create images of a wide range of other subjects, such as animals, landscapes, objects, or abstract concepts. """
- bastawhiz 1y ago
  What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
  - tanaros 1y ago
    The rejection message doesn’t seem to be accurate. I tried “happy person” as a prompt in AI Studio and it generated a happy human without any complaints. It’s possible that they relaxed the safety filtering to allow humans but forgot to update the error message.
    - deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]
  - geysersam 1y ago
    It's unfortunate they can't just explain the real reason they don't want to generate the image: "Unfortunately I'm not able to generate images that might cause bad PR for Alphabet(tm) or subsidiaries. Is there anything else I can generate for you?"
    - int_19h 1y ago
      If you want that kind of thing, Qwen3 delivers: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_might_be_censored_but_it_is_also_brutally/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_m...

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

martythemaniak 1y ago

What is a "1920s nazi officer" what do they look like?

detaro 1y ago
brown uniform, red armband with swastika was the usual SA look in the 1920s.
- rvnx 1y ago
  Mh. Apparently like this if we ask AI: https://postimg.cc/xX9K3kLP https://postimg.cc/xX9K3kLP ...
  - shawabawa3 1y ago
    i wonder if there was a single black or asian member of this particular military group, presumably not
sorokod 1y ago
The SA article has some photos https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

Der_Einzige 1y ago

The moment the weights are on huggingface someone with orthogonalize/abliterate the model and make it uncensored.

rvnx 1y ago
BigBanana would be a good name for that future OnlyFans model