That's an interesting take but I think it's unlikely for two reasons: 1. In any case you view it, it's not trivial, which was the statement in the note. If it

That's an interesting take but I think it's unlikely for two reasons: 1. In any case you view it, it's not trivial, which was the statement in the note. If it were, the effort to publish just for n=4 would be silly, because it would take equal effort to just publish for general case. That he withheld the proof just to mess with people is highly unlikely. 2. I definitely do not make private notes in my books just so that maybe somebody later on would pick up that book and wonder whether I had indeed discovered the secrets of the universe. I definitely do not write "challenges to the community" there.