6 ms·

Seems about right. My official title at work is "AI Engineer". What does that mean exactly? - I'm not a researcher and not fine tuning or deploying models on G

by extr 1y ago

Seems about right. My official title at work is "AI Engineer". What does that mean exactly? - I'm not a researcher and not fine tuning or deploying models on GPUs - I have a math/traditional ML background, but my explanation of how transformers, tokenizers, etc work would be hand-wavy at best. - I'm a "regular engineer" in the sense I'm following many of the standard SWE/SDLC practices in my org. - I'm exclusively focused on building AI features for our product, I wear a PM hat too. - I'm pretty tuned in to the latest model releases and capabilities of frontier models, and consider being able to articulate that information part of my job. - I also use AI heavily to produce code, which is helpfully a pretty good way to get a sense for model capabilities. Do I deserve a special job title...maybe? I think there's definitely an argument that "AI Engineering" really isn't a special thing, and considering how much of my day to day is pure integration work with the actual product, I can see that. OTOH, part of my job and my value at work is very product based. I pay a lot of attention to what other people in the industry are doing, new model releases, and how others are building things, since it's such a new area and there's no "standard playbook" yet for many things. I actually quite enjoy it since there's a ton of opportunity to be creative. When AI first started becoming big I thought about doing the other direction - leveraging my math/ML background to get deeper into GPUs and MLOps/research-lite kind of work. Instead I went in a more producty direction, which I don't regret yet.

apwell23 1y ago
> I pay a lot of attention to what other people in the industry are doing, new model releases, and how others are building things, what do you think of recent MIT news that 95% gen ai projects don't do anything valuable at all ?
- extr 1y ago
  Sounds kind of aggressive but probably the number is up there.
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
- Nevermark 1y ago
  > what do you think of recent MIT news that 95% gen ai projects don't do anything valuable at all ? Worth noting that a project that ends up “doing nothing” isn’t the same as a project that had/created no value. Even some projects that in hindsight were deterministic lemons. Assuming compute resources continue scaling up, and architectures keep improving, AI change now has an everything, everywhere, all the time, scope. Failing fast is necessarily going to have a substantial dimension.
- IanCal 1y ago
  Not sure the majority of projects do anything valuable at all.
- janalsncm 1y ago
  You would need to compare that to the baseline value creation from non-AI projects.
tamimio 1y ago
Who cares? The word "engineer" is meaningless now and anyone can be a self-proclaimed engineer whenever they feel like it. Will anyone double check or even reject you for an engineering job when you are not? Absolutely not! Take a bootcamp, submit plenty of PRs correcting typos, and pass the interview with the help of AI and you basically made it, dreams come true!!
- glitchc 1y ago
  Yeah the term "engineer" has been diluted into oblivion, and we only have ourselves to blame for not protecting it.
  - _9ptr 1y ago
    In German you're not even an engineer if you don't sometimes wear a hard hat or hold a screwdriver.
  - tamimio 1y ago
    Agree 100%, even blue collar workers guard their profession. Hell, I was talking to a friend and they rejected her for a retail job because she had never worked in retail before. Engineering on the other hand has zero gatekeeping - it's a sign spinner job right now. Just do a few humiliation rituals like daily standup and you're the perfect candidate!
    - glitchc 1y ago
      > Just do a few cleansing rituals like daily standup and you're the perfect candidate! There, FTFY
  - fakedang 1y ago
    In Dubai, the poor underpaid folks cleaning the roads and gutters late at night are called "Cleaning Engineers" and "Garden Engineers". It's honestly sad, almost a mockery.
    - quesera 1y ago
andrew_lettuce 1y ago
We all know the AI part is largely meaningless because of the hype and nonsense, but what defines you as an engineer? When you consider that classical engineers are responsible for the correctness of their work, combining it with AI seems like a joke
- extr 1y ago
  Hard to tell what you're even trying to say here. I am obviously responsible for the correctness of my work. "AI Engineer" does not generally mean "AI-Assisted Engineer", thought that was clear from my post.
- potatolicious 1y ago
  > "When you consider that classical engineers are responsible for the correctness of their work" Woah hang on, I think this betrays a severe misunderstanding of what engineers do. FWIW I was trained as a classical engineer (mechanical), but pretty much just write code these days. But I did have a past life as a not-SWE. Most classical engineering fields deal with probabilistic system components all of the time. In fact I'd go as far as to say that inability to deal with probabilistic components is disqualifying from many engineering endeavors. Process engineers for example have to account for human error rates. On a given production line with humans in a loop, the operators will sometimes screw up. Designing systems to detect these errors (which are highly probabilistic!), mitigate them, and reduce the occurrence rates of such errors is a huge part of the job. Likewise even for regular mechanical engineers, there are probabilistic variances in manufacturing tolerances. Your specs are always given with confidence intervals (this metal sheet is 1mm thick +- 0.05mm) because of this. All of the designs you work on specifically account for this (hence safety margins!). The ways in which these probabilities combine and interact is a serious field of study. Software engineering is unlike traditional engineering disciplines in that for most of its lifetime it's had the luxury of purely deterministic expectations. This is not true in nearly every other type of engineering. If anything the advent of ML has introduced this element to software, and the ability to actually work with probabilistic outcomes is what separates those who are serious about this stuff vs. demoware hot air blowers.
  - 1y ago
nlawalker 1y ago
The author’s definitions suggest you should have “Applied” in your title, which I like, but my impression is that “applied” roles so vastly outnumber “creation of models” roles globally that it’s actually the latter that would benefit from a modifier. For now, you have to rely on context (mostly the nature of the company’s primary output) when trying to interpret something like a job posting or an acquaintance’s title.
- janalsncm 1y ago
  It’s not that crazy to add a couple of domain-specific prediction heads to a BERT-family pretrained model and then do a quick fine tuning. By volume that’s less common but I would guess most people are just using things off the shelf and might not even consider themselves AI engineers. I have no frame of reference though.

by extr 1y ago

apwell23 1y ago

> I pay a lot of attention to what other people in the industry are doing, new model releases, and how others are building things, what do you think of recent MIT news that 95% gen ai projects don't do anything valuable at all ?

extr 1y ago
Sounds kind of aggressive but probably the number is up there.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
Nevermark 1y ago
> what do you think of recent MIT news that 95% gen ai projects don't do anything valuable at all ? Worth noting that a project that ends up “doing nothing” isn’t the same as a project that had/created no value. Even some projects that in hindsight were deterministic lemons. Assuming compute resources continue scaling up, and architectures keep improving, AI change now has an everything, everywhere, all the time, scope. Failing fast is necessarily going to have a substantial dimension.
IanCal 1y ago
Not sure the majority of projects do anything valuable at all.
janalsncm 1y ago
You would need to compare that to the baseline value creation from non-AI projects.

tamimio 1y ago

Who cares? The word "engineer" is meaningless now and anyone can be a self-proclaimed engineer whenever they feel like it. Will anyone double check or even reject you for an engineering job when you are not? Absolutely not! Take a bootcamp, submit plenty of PRs correcting typos, and pass the interview with the help of AI and you basically made it, dreams come true!!

glitchc 1y ago
Yeah the term "engineer" has been diluted into oblivion, and we only have ourselves to blame for not protecting it.
- _9ptr 1y ago
  In German you're not even an engineer if you don't sometimes wear a hard hat or hold a screwdriver.
- tamimio 1y ago
  Agree 100%, even blue collar workers guard their profession. Hell, I was talking to a friend and they rejected her for a retail job because she had never worked in retail before. Engineering on the other hand has zero gatekeeping - it's a sign spinner job right now. Just do a few humiliation rituals like daily standup and you're the perfect candidate!
  - glitchc 1y ago
    > Just do a few cleansing rituals like daily standup and you're the perfect candidate! There, FTFY
- fakedang 1y ago
  In Dubai, the poor underpaid folks cleaning the roads and gutters late at night are called "Cleaning Engineers" and "Garden Engineers". It's honestly sad, almost a mockery.
  - quesera 1y ago

andrew_lettuce 1y ago

We all know the AI part is largely meaningless because of the hype and nonsense, but what defines you as an engineer? When you consider that classical engineers are responsible for the correctness of their work, combining it with AI seems like a joke

extr 1y ago
Hard to tell what you're even trying to say here. I am obviously responsible for the correctness of my work. "AI Engineer" does not generally mean "AI-Assisted Engineer", thought that was clear from my post.
potatolicious 1y ago
> "When you consider that classical engineers are responsible for the correctness of their work" Woah hang on, I think this betrays a severe misunderstanding of what engineers do. FWIW I was trained as a classical engineer (mechanical), but pretty much just write code these days. But I did have a past life as a not-SWE. Most classical engineering fields deal with probabilistic system components all of the time. In fact I'd go as far as to say that inability to deal with probabilistic components is disqualifying from many engineering endeavors. Process engineers for example have to account for human error rates. On a given production line with humans in a loop, the operators will sometimes screw up. Designing systems to detect these errors (which are highly probabilistic!), mitigate them, and reduce the occurrence rates of such errors is a huge part of the job. Likewise even for regular mechanical engineers, there are probabilistic variances in manufacturing tolerances. Your specs are always given with confidence intervals (this metal sheet is 1mm thick +- 0.05mm) because of this. All of the designs you work on specifically account for this (hence safety margins!). The ways in which these probabilities combine and interact is a serious field of study. Software engineering is unlike traditional engineering disciplines in that for most of its lifetime it's had the luxury of purely deterministic expectations. This is not true in nearly every other type of engineering. If anything the advent of ML has introduced this element to software, and the ability to actually work with probabilistic outcomes is what separates those who are serious about this stuff vs. demoware hot air blowers.
- 1y ago

nlawalker 1y ago

The author’s definitions suggest you should have “Applied” in your title, which I like, but my impression is that “applied” roles so vastly outnumber “creation of models” roles globally that it’s actually the latter that would benefit from a modifier. For now, you have to rely on context (mostly the nature of the company’s primary output) when trying to interpret something like a job posting or an acquaintance’s title.

janalsncm 1y ago
It’s not that crazy to add a couple of domain-specific prediction heads to a BERT-family pretrained model and then do a quick fine tuning. By volume that’s less common but I would guess most people are just using things off the shelf and might not even consider themselves AI engineers. I have no frame of reference though.