4 ms·
Stop Paywalling SSO: It Is a Basic Right, Not an Enterprise Perk
- bitpush 1y ago"Basic Right"? Have words lost meaning? At best, this is an opinion or a wish.
- esseph 1y agoIt's critical for national security for underfunded sectors. It's not really an "ask", FedGov through NIST / CISA is requiring it.
- BalinKing 1y agoThere's very little content here—it's basically just an ad.
- codegeek 1y agoI will add the obligatory https://sso.tax https://sso.tax
- bitpush 1y ago> If companies claim to “take your security seriously”, then SSO should be available as a feature that is either: >> - part of the core product, or >> - an optional paid extra for a reasonable delta, or attached to a price tier, but with a reasonably small gap between the non-SSO tier and SSO tiers. >> - Many vendors charge 2x, 3x, or 4x the base product pricing for access to SSO, which disincentivizes its use and encourages poor security practices. ---- I dont follow the logic. Food and shelter are a human rights, but that doesnt mean you can walk into a restaurant and insist that food be served at $dream price, or walk into Home Depot and take premium plywood and pay basic/entry level price.
- rufus_foreman 1y agoWe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and (checks notes) Single Sign On.
- jasonmclaren 1y agoStrangely, their Pricing page shows they don't offer SSO until the third pricing tier, at $99/user-month.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- sitzkrieg 1y agolocking people into your identity management +sso moat is all the rage these days
- simpleTaffy 1y agoIs this some kind of satire? They might provide the feature in their selfhosted OSS offering, but they "paywall" it in their cloud offering behind $84/user. Sure, cool for the self-hosted guys but orgs that use their cloud offering better pay up. :-)