4 ms·
No. I also thought that even a 95% success rate wouldn't be good enough for airplanes.
by madcaptenor 1y ago
No. I also thought that even a 95% success rate wouldn't be good enough for airplanes.
- mr_toad 1y agoI just assumed it was developed by Boeing.
- rigrassm 1y agoThank you for starting my week with a good laugh!
- Culonavirus 1y agoIt's very much enough for drones tho... all you need is a tiny Jensen's chip, moped engine, some boom boom play-doh and you're ready to rock. No remote control needed.
- zero_shift 1y agoDrones are expensive. Solid six figures expensive. And they are used around or on things that are even more expensive. You wouldn't want ChatGPT piloting them.
- Culonavirus 1y agoUnder $50k for a Geran-2 level drone.
- stockresearcher 1y agoAn autonomous Flock drone costs $275k per year: https://abc7chicago.com/post/oak-brook-police-department-launches-fully-autonomous-drone-first-responder-concerned-privacy-rights/17539659/ https://abc7chicago.com/post/oak-brook-police-department-lau...
- zero_shift 1y agoMuch more for an oil rig platform surveillance drone. And if it crashes into something important, more expensive still.
- red-iron-pine 1y agothe AI part is simple. getting past GPS jamming and optical dazzlers so that drone AI can function is hard.
- apwell23 1y agowe can do it once we know how they work. which will be never.
- marcosdumay 1y agoAs a rule of thumb, airplanes subsystems are expected to have 99.99999% reliability, so the whole gets 99.9999%. Airline airplanes are currently more than one order of magnitude better than this. But if you have that, you can claim your plane works.