4 ms·
Yes, of course it should be. You point out of of theain flaws in our system. Those who actually produce things and pay for them never get any ownership. They re
by guerrilla 1y ago
Yes, of course it should be. You point out of of theain flaws in our system. Those who actually produce things and pay for them never get any ownership. They remain disadvantaged dispite their contributions.
- philipallstar 1y agoThey pay for the thing they get. They exchanged money for product or service. Anyone can start a company and contribute the money required for that company.
- guerrilla 1y ago> Anyone can start a company and contribute the money required for that company. No, anyone can't. That's the point. If the money is siphoned out of the lower class, then they have no capital (or free time) to start a business. They're barely getting by. It's a positive feedback loop in both directions (up and down). Rich get rich, poor get poorer (in general).
- boppo1 1y agoIf you are upset about 'rich get richer, poor get poorer', you should read up on quantitative easing and how it inflated assets if you're not familiar with the topic yet.
- nradov 1y agoAnyone in the USA can. I've met people who started successful small businesses doing things like landscaping and pest control with basically zero capital or free time. They just went ahead and did it. If you try hard enough you can always find an excuse for failure.
- guerrilla 1y agoThat is notremotely comparable. :D If you try hard enough you can always find an excuse for oppression.