4 ms·
You should think more. You should think less. You should be constantly thinking. You should never think at all. It’s not that simple yo. Maybe the author of t
by olliesaunders 14y ago
You should think more. You should think less. You should be constantly thinking. You should never think at all.
It’s not that simple yo.
Maybe the author of this article has a particular person and a particular task in mind when he says you should think less but, if you take him literally (as if he is saying all people should think less, all the time), he is definitely wrong. We didn’t evolve awkwardly large brains because they look nice or because god likes women to die giving birth.
Here’s are my two most important points: how much you should think depends on task at hand and whether you should modify the amount you think depends on your current habits. Any person who tells you how much to think and hasn’t considered these points is talking to the clouds.
Examples:
Yesterday I was transferring computer components between two different cases. While trying to install the optical drive, without thinking I kept putting the mounting brackets on the wrong way. Once I was sufficiently frustrated I actually thought about what I was doing. I realized that there were 8 possible ways to mount the brackets; only one way was correct; and then, after about 20 seconds of thinking, I learned the correct way and why it was correct. Had I used those 20 seconds of thinking at the start I could have saved myself 20 minutes of fumbling around. Moral of the story: thinking is good?
Second example. When I come home from the store I have to unpack my shopping into an inadequately sized fridge. When this problem was novel to me I used to pontificate about the best packing configuration and create a detailed plan. When unpacking I would find some things wouldn’t fit and others would have too much space so the plan needed to be revised. I would also worry about how difficult it was to retrieve things from the fridge once I’d packed them so I could find myself standing in front of the fridge for quite some time trying to make the best possible decisions.
Needless to say, I don’t do this any more. Instead I just start packing the shopping away and I just try things until its all packed and I don’t worry too much. I suppose I’m still thinking as I’m doing it but I’m also in a state of flow. Moral of the story: thinking is bad?
I think the point here has less to do with thinking and everything to do with control. We are naturally wired to find situations where we are out of control stressful and so we conclude that more control is always better when actually getting control of some things is more work than it’s worth.
Perhaps this is a lesson programmers need to learn more than other people. I used to program for a living and now I work with people a lot more than computers. I’m still having difficulty getting used to the fact that some of the people I work with aren’t that bright, or don’t care about doing a good job, or are used to always getting their own way. If you try to control that, you go insane.
As a corollary, maybe if you limit your attempts to control to a reasonable degree and you are able to keep your thinking focused, you should think as much as possible.
Please criticize what I’ve said here.
- ChuckMcM 14y agoI think you are further along the path than the OP is. This has come up several times recently in various forms [1], basically analysis paralysis is a bad thing, it interferes with getting things done. Its quite reasonable to analyze things, and then to stop when the future benefit is small. [1] http://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/all&q=analysis+paralysis&start=0 http://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/all&q=analysis+pa...
- stinos 14y agofunny I've gone through the fridge sample myself. However I choose the path in between the two solutions: yes just flowing and tertris'ing your stuff definitely costs less time, but I soon discovered it would drive me mad after a while because I couldn't find things quickly. Not because they were unreachable, but becasue they were in a different place every week or so. Which is hard if like me, the autistic side of your brain likes to have things always in the same place just because that way of organising undeniably gives you the fastest way to get something back. So now I still go with the tetris way, but to make it more convenient afterwards (and to make the game more interesting, lol) there are now categories. Anyway long story short: you are 100% right and the OP's story is a fine read but too general. Which is often the case on the net.
- olliesaunders 14y agoWhich is hard if like me, the autistic side of your brain likes to have things always in the same place just because that way of organising undeniably gives you the fastest way to get something back. To which I would ask: are you doing that out of a need to have control and order or because you really think it is a worthwhile use of your time? I’m not too dogmatic about it though. Sometimes it just feels good to get everything nice and organized. And I think it’s also important to feel comfortable. The time to question these things is when you think it is a bottleneck in your overall performance. Any person dedicated to being a great programmer should seldom worry about how they are packing the fridge unless its affecting their ability to program, for example.
- stinos 14y ago