2 ms·
No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense
by genrader 1y ago
No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense
- ryandv 1y agoJust about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.
- staticman2 1y ago>>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense If you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly. "One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur. Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.
- GuB-42 1y agoThis makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible. The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost.
- naasking 1y ago> The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
- tmcdos 1y agoMaybe that's one of the reasons they created the Bibble. Notice the word "created" and not "wrote".
- donkeybeer 1y agoThe Romans built a civilization
- tclancy 1y agoPlease clarify, instructions unclear.