4 ms·
All of those rules exist in order to prevent an unintended killing. They would not be necessary without a machine designed for killing. I don't know why this is
by baggachipz 1y ago
All of those rules exist in order to prevent an unintended killing. They would not be necessary without a machine designed for killing. I don't know why this is so complicated. No gun present, no gunshot. Gun present, possible gunshot.
I'm not trolling. You can have all the "safety" protocols you want, but at the end of the day it still won't stop every unintended killing due to a killing machine.
- pc86 1y agoI agree with you. The problem is people use these objective facts (none of which are in dispute so far as I know) to make completely asinine arguments like "just make some guns illegal" or "just take away everyone's guns." So that makes it very difficult to have level-headed discussions.
- sitkack 1y agoDon't pretend. You are trolling. The same thing can be said for circular saw. The intention is the important aspect regardless of the purpose of the device. Stop being coy and immature.
- pc86 1y agoIf I had to guess I'd say less trolling and more "my chosen political faction doesn't like guns and therefore there is nothing any human being on earth could say that would make me think they're okay, or even morally neutral."