3 ms·
To save you a click: no, the author does not provide any source for the headline.
by felipeerias 1y ago
To save you a click: no, the author does not provide any source for the headline.
- Jedd 1y ago> To save you a click: no, the author does not provide any source for the headline. TFA kind of did, with the '20-30 dollars per person, per month, across an organisation' quote / comment - though they didn't do the math for you. But that range of monthly spend only needs 220-400 ish people to reach the headline figure of $100k. Whether that's good value, who can say.
- malfist 1y agoWith a large code base and big context windows, it's easy to blow past the $20-30 allocation in an hour
- CamelCaseName 1y ago100K, per developer?
- Jedd 1y agoOh, I overlooked that bit. The math on the 'if costs keep rising' bit of the story would take a hefty amount of (the bad type of) oversight to get to that figure per developer, yes.
- IshKebab 1y agoI think they read this nonsense: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44867312 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44867312
- felipeerias 1y agoPossibly, although at least that article tried to justify the $100k with some handwaving about multiple agents working in parallel with minimal human supervision. Unfortunately, people are swallowing the headline without any critical thinking.