3 ms·

Microsoft has excellent documentation. So that's one counterexample. :)

• cosmotic 1y ago
  It was excellent. It's a mess last time I looked.
  • userbinator 1y ago
    Their documentation for the very newest stuff contains very obviously AI-generated inaccurate and misleading crap.
    • userbinator 1y ago
      Don't believe me? Go look at it yourself. They've even "edited" the old docs with AI slop. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/usbcon/transfer-data-to-isochronous-endpoints https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/u... "The characteristics of the endpoint determine the size of each packet is fixed and determined by the characteristics of the endpoint."
      • WithinReason 1y ago
        If they used AI the sentence would be coherent
      • noname120 1y ago
        That sentence was already there _at least_ since Dec 2022, stop seeing AI everywhere. https://web.archive.org/web/20221214171028/https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/usbcon/transfer-data-to-isochronous-endpoints https://web.archive.org/web/20221214171028/https://learn.mic...
        • userbinator 1y ago
          They were using an automated editing tool before that.
          • noname120 1y ago
            Moving goalpost + evidence needed
• sofixa 1y ago
  No they don't. Just last week I was looking for something, found a Google result from Microsoft's docs, but opening it resulted in a page saying they're moving docs around, this one isn't being moved, fuck off. No content, no link to the content.
• rblatz 1y ago
  Most of the time I just get function signatures that are already exposed via intellisense. Sometimes they actually have examples of how to use it, but most are just Javadoc level, and of minimal use.