2 ms·
It does, for M.2, which is really great: much better than an SD card. I was writing generally about the comments I see about these types of low cost boards: we
by topspin 1y ago
It does, for M.2, which is really great: much better than an SD card.
I was writing generally about the comments I see about these types of low cost boards: we are awash in these products, which is a good thing, but many are not designed with the care, tools, talent and materials necessary to max out high value features like PCI-E, and people frequently complain about the lack of PCI-E, not understanding what is involved.
Personally, I'd like to see a "headless" board forgo nearly all of the typical peripherals. Have a 1x PCI-E M.2 for boot, 1x 10/100 Ethernet for a shell, then a number of PCI-E 1x and 4x connectors for whatever one might want. Let an ecosystem of mini PCI-E boards develop around it such that one could plug-in whatever is desired: WiFi/Bluetooth/LoRa, xGB ethernet, USB 3/4/x, HDMI, MIPI, ADC/DAC, etc.
It would require someone to develop a SOC intended for this, as opposed to repurposing Broadcom's phone chips and whatnot. But with so many RISC-V SOC manufacturers around now, this is no longer implausible.
- Dylan16807 1y agoMy core point is that whatever is involved, it's also involved in $2 aliexpress hubs with probably $.50 chips. If a computer costs more than $20 it can afford to have PCIe lanes. If there's lockin because they're stuck using particular chips, that makes sense. But it's not because there's particular difficulty in dealing with the signal rates of PCIe 3 or at least 2.