4 ms·
> “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.” acceptable to whom?
by GuinansEyebrows 1y ago
> “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.”
acceptable to whom? who are the actual people who are responsible for this behavior?
- add-sub-mul-div 1y ago> acceptable to whom? Anyone who still has an account on any Meta property.
- GuinansEyebrows 1y agoi dunno if i'm comfortable "demanding" our way out of this "supply" issue. people are being paid to approve this content across their systems.
- 12_throw_away 1y agoAnd in case anyone thinks this is out of context, it gets worse with specific examples of how a "romantic encounter" between a chatbot and a child might play out: The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss. Who wrote this?
- GauntletWizard 1y agoAverage, "perfectly normal" San Franciscans. This kind of belief is incredibly common there, we've just not been forced to confront it until now.
- ringeryless 1y agoyou mean rural maga voters who fuel P.hubz step-obsession? we know you, rural america. we know what you do on halloween. pumpkin. your sf jibe warranted this response. you cooked it, eat up.
- rsynnott 1y agoSee "Careless People"; Facebook is run by idiots overconfident in their own abilities.