3 ms·

Why bother to be on a discussion forum if you're so pressed for time that you're lashing out at people agreeing with you and consider any interlocution a waste

Why bother to be on a discussion forum if you're so pressed for time that you're lashing out at people agreeing with you and consider any interlocution a waste of time? From the outside, it looks like all you get out of this is feeling upset, and it makes us wonder how you misread so wildly.

jadamson 1y ago
I didn't misread anything. refulgentis edited his comment after I replied, and the issue seems to stem from his failure to understand the comment I replied to. Without that context, my reply obviously won't make sense either. The comment I replied to is pretty standard feminist dreck, and if you can't understand it, maybe interlocute them first? Debate is one thing, spoon-feeding you explanations of someone else's comment is another. Still, I'll give you a hint: both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different - again, I did not misread them in that regard. The difference is that I take that to a logical conclusion, while they are bound by ideology to stop short.
- refulgentis 1y ago
  What, exactly, did my edits change? Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism." Genuinely, I hope you're well.
  - jadamson 1y ago
    > Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different I'm literally not claiming that, lmao. Sorry, but I won't be replying to you further because you're clearly functionally illiterate. What I said was that: > both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different If you don't understand a chain of comments, start from the top, and stop wasting my time.
    - refulgentis 1y ago
      Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism."
      - deleted 1y ago
        [deleted]

jadamson 1y ago

I didn't misread anything. refulgentis edited his comment after I replied, and the issue seems to stem from his failure to understand the comment I replied to. Without that context, my reply obviously won't make sense either. The comment I replied to is pretty standard feminist dreck, and if you can't understand it, maybe interlocute them first? Debate is one thing, spoon-feeding you explanations of someone else's comment is another. Still, I'll give you a hint: both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different - again, I did not misread them in that regard. The difference is that I take that to a logical conclusion, while they are bound by ideology to stop short.

refulgentis 1y ago
What, exactly, did my edits change? Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism." Genuinely, I hope you're well.
- jadamson 1y ago
  > Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different I'm literally not claiming that, lmao. Sorry, but I won't be replying to you further because you're clearly functionally illiterate. What I said was that: > both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different If you don't understand a chain of comments, start from the top, and stop wasting my time.
  - refulgentis 1y ago
    Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism."
    - deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]