2 ms·
Most of those persons probably understood "officially implicated" as "subject to yet another spurious allegation". While the outrage is maximized by reading it
by nullc 1y ago
Most of those persons probably understood "officially implicated" as "subject to yet another spurious allegation".
While the outrage is maximized by reading it as "Would you vote for trump if he confessed to molesting children?" -- I'm confident that question would have gotten a different result.
- add-sub-mul-div 1y agoHad this standard of nuance and thoughtfulness been applied to Pizzagate I might buy this.
- watwut 1y agoGiven Trump openly talked about sexual harasment of women and given his has known track record, I doubt it will be different with kids. The peoples outrages are highly stratetic. Tan suit on democratic president, is massive breach of decorum. Grab them by the pussy is fine.
- bithive123 1y agoOr they would say what they've always said when Trump openly does something hideous. "That girl was no angel." "She was asking for it." "Biden and Obama did the same thing but worse." "The facts are a liberal hoax." Which sort of reaction do we have more examples of?
- belter 1y agoUnfortunately you are wrong, as every single true fact on this site demonstrates: https://goppredators.wordpress.com/ https://goppredators.wordpress.com/