3 ms·
> Note that Claude 4 Sonnet isn’t the strongest model from Anthropic’s Claude series. Claude Opus is their most capable model for coding, but it seemed inapprop
by arcticfox 1y ago
> Note that Claude 4 Sonnet isn’t the strongest model from Anthropic’s Claude series. Claude Opus is their most capable model for coding, but it seemed inappropriate to compare it with GPT-5 because it costs 10 times as much.
Well - I would have been interested in GPT-5 vs. Opus. Claude Code Max is affordable with Opus.
- swader999 1y agoYou're absolutely right!
- intellectronica 1y ago:D
- rubslopes 1y ago"I see it now!"
- qeternity 1y ago> Claude Code Max is affordable with Opus Because Anthropic is presumably massively subsidizing the usage.
- kvirani 1y agoIsn't it all heavily subsidized by VC money at this time?
- adventured 1y agoOpenAI for its part is tracking to $12-$15 billion in annual sales. If they slapped a basic ad model for referring onto what they're already doing, it's an easily profitable enterprise doing $30+ billion in sales next year. Frankly they should have already built and deployed that, it would make their free versions instantly profitable and they could boost usage limits and choke off the competition. It's the very straight-forward path to financially ruining their various weaker competition. Anthropic is Lyft in this scenario (and I say that as a big fan of Claude).
- inquirerGeneral 1y ago[dead]
- kingstnap 1y agoThe APIs are marginally profitable. You can calculate the lifecycle costs of the open models on clusters in batched inference and figure out its less than than what they charge. The training and researches are very expensive. The fixed price subscriptions are 100% a sweetheart deal.
- Filligree 1y agoWhich doesn’t factor into my immediate decisions.