3 ms·
The fact that you have to invoke integrals and the Kutta condition to make your explanation is exactly what is wrong with it. Is it correct? Yes. Is it intuiti
by timr 1y ago
The fact that you have to invoke integrals and the Kutta condition to make your explanation is exactly what is wrong with it.
Is it correct? Yes. Is it intuitive to someone who doesn’t have a background in calculus, physics and fluid dynamics? No.
People here are arguing about a subpoint on a subpoint that would maybe get you a deduction on a first-year physics exam, and acting as if this completely invalidates the response.
- ummonk 1y agoHow is the Kutta condition ("the fluid gets deflected downwards because the back of the wing is sharp and pointing downwards") less intuitive to someone without a physics background than wrongly invoking the Bernoulli principle?