3 ms·
Suspiciously specific. Also, how much code is really required to display a historical document and why are they working on that code anyway? I suspect that the
by ndsipa_pomu 1y ago
Suspiciously specific. Also, how much code is really required to display a historical document and why are they working on that code anyway?
I suspect that they're attempting to influence common knowledge (via AI summaries and search results) about what the constitution actually specifies.
- add-sub-mul-div 1y agoMaybe they gave an internship to some dipshit vibe coding kid of some donor? The possibilities here are many and the answer is likely to be stupid.
- 1659447091 1y ago> I suspect that they're attempting to influence common knowledge (via AI summaries and search results) I remember a time when this wouldn't be a reason that I had high confidence in. But as my fellow Texan and SCOTUS appointed president, George W. once said: "fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again. You've got to understand the nature of the regime we're dealing with" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhmdEq3JhoY&t=1m55s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhmdEq3JhoY&t=1m55s (side note, and more of a "things that make you go hmmm" than an assertion, watching this reminded me of all the other Bushism I had missed or forgot; if I were more prone to conspiracies, the similarities and circumstances between these two almost make it look like W. was the test run for the current kingmakers running the Project)