4 ms·
Why would they buy exactly 49% and not 51% of Intel? If these extra 2% are not available, why buy 49% then and not just 2-5%?
by achempion 1y ago
Why would they buy exactly 49% and not 51% of Intel? If these extra 2% are not available, why buy 49% then and not just 2-5%?
- bathtub365 1y agoThey don’t want a successful foreign company to have a controlling interest in their failing domestic company
- tremon 1y agoIs your "they" the same as the parent's "they"? Seems like you're talking about different parties.
- seanmcdirmid 1y agoThey want to ensure that TSMC doesn't have a controlling stake.
- sct202 1y agoThe remaining 51% would be highly fractured unless it was like the US government on the otherside. One of the publicly traded companies I worked at effectively got taken over with <20% of regular shares by an activist billionaire.
- seanmcdirmid 1y agoYa, they would have to make their stake non-voting regardless, then what would be the point? I don't think Trump thought this through.
- rvba 1y agoThe 51% would be controlled by the few people from funds, who live in USA - and who are easy to "influence"