5 ms·

What's the part about this that's lawfare?

• matheusmoreira 1y ago
  The part where the current president's former lawyer is one of the "impartial" judge-kings involved in the case. "We defeated Bolsonarism!" -- Barroso, one of the judge-kings. Is further proof necessary?
  • Daishiman 1y ago
    Yeah, you'll need more than that because the results of the investigations so far are pretty coherent with Bolsonaro's beliefs in democracy as well as all the people who surrounded him.
    • matheusmoreira 1y ago
      I wasn't condemning the investigations into Bolsonaro's affairs at all. I was condemning the court that's judging him. I have no doubt his sentence has already been decided regardless of evidence.
  • nemesisithetic 1y ago
    Proof of what? That your political position is "rambling incoherence"?
    • matheusmoreira 1y ago
      I merely pointed out the painfully obvious impartiality of the court. Nothing incoherent about it. Bolsonaro's guilt has already been decided, they're just going through the motions. Gotta look like a democracy.