3 ms·

I can only repeat my previous comment....

• blackqueeriroh 1y ago
  Yes, you can repeat your previous comment, but the data supports that this is nothing new.
  • lazyeye 1y ago
    The fact that adjustments have happened in the past in no way disproves the idea that recent estimates/adjustments may have been made in support of a political agenda.
    • Daishiman 1y ago
      You have suggested something without evidence. You have not put anything to argue or defend.
      • lazyeye 1y ago
        Nobody here has provided any evidence for anything they've stated either. Apparently after the recent election, the jobs numbers were adjusted down by close to 800k, (meaning of course, they had been inflated by 800k prior to the election). This would be the largest adjustment in 50 years (outside of covid). Discussed here https://youtube.com/shorts/Mcpom9jUNJE https://youtube.com/shorts/Mcpom9jUNJE
        • Daishiman 1y ago
          The evidence is clear as day that there's been a semester of back and forth in insane tariffs and fluctuations in the bond market that are introducing a level of self-induced uncertainty that trivially explains it.
          • lazyeye 1y ago
            [flagged]
            • Daishiman 1y ago
              It is much more easily explained by the fact that Trump surrounds himself with ignorant sycophants and fires anyone who disagrees with him as evidenced time and time again so unless you bring some real piece of evidence you'll be discarded as a trivial troll.
              • lazyeye 1y ago
                I disagree. Given the lengths we've seen the Democrat party will go to, to take out a political opponent, fudging some jobs numbers is rather tame by comparison.