2 ms·
It is that the asset can be forfeit before a judicial decision. And as a second, that there is no requirement to involve the asset owner in a judicial proceedin
by marcosdumay 1y ago
It is that the asset can be forfeit before a judicial decision. And as a second, that there is no requirement to involve the asset owner in a judicial proceeding.
Civil forfeiture is a hot topic all over the world. But the US has Executive forfeiture in practice.
- esbranson 1y ago> in practice One of the differences is that the US has PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), that in practice we have a clue. Since the 80s. It adds up.