> ... that are secure ... That's a huge assumption I wouldn't make after reading "dumb". And from the article: > Easy, direct connections that punch through

> ... that are secure ... That's a huge assumption I wouldn't make after reading "dumb". And from the article: > Easy, direct connections that punch through NATs & stay connected as network conditions change. This sounds more like a pipe that is trying to be smart. According to your principle, not something to build a secure system with.