5 ms·

>Brussels is reacting with new support plans Pure insanity. The money the government or the EU in this case, has, comes from corporations who pay taxes or peop

>Brussels is reacting with new support plans Pure insanity. The money the government or the EU in this case, has, comes from corporations who pay taxes or people who work for the corporations and then pay taxes. The government financially supporting corporations is just giving the profits of one company to another company. Which does exactly nothing to make the economy at large better. It also punishes successful corporations, because they now have to pay for the losses of other sectors. What is desperately needed are better conditions for business. First and foremost the electricity prices have to come down. You can not have successful industry with electricity prices this high. The entire continent is suffering from it yet the measures taken to do anything about it are miniscule. Europe needs energy production right now to keep it's industry afloat.

xiphias2 1y ago
Energy prices in Europe went up because US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. Everybody who really wants knows which country benefited the most from the Nordstream pipeline being destroyed. Of course I agree with all the other points that you have made, but at least this part wasn't just Brussels administration.
- Isamu 1y ago
  >US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. You can say Russia. And there are also EU citizens who are not happy about the war in Europe and want to sanction Russia, but sure nobody wants to pay for that.
  - selivanovp 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - constantcrying 1y ago
      [flagged]
    - dismalaf 1y ago
      Even if you believe this line of propaganda, Zelenskyy is not who was brought to power in 2015. That was Poroshenko. I don't know if you followed Ukrainian politics when Zelenskyy was elected, but Zelenskyy is a native Russian-speaker (he consciously refuses to speak Russian now) who was accused of being pro-Russia by Poroshenko and the Orange Revolution politicians, and basically only became anti-Russia when he tried negotiating the end of the conflict in Donbass/Luhansk and then of course, when Russia fully invaded...
      - drysine 1y ago
        >basically only became anti-Russia when he tried negotiating the end of the conflict in Donbass/Luhansk and then of course, when Russia fully invaded Here are "NGO"s threatening Zelensky with another Maidan right after his election [0]: As civil society activists, we present a list of “red lines not to be crossed”. Should the President cross these red lines, such actions will inevitably lead to political instability in our country and the deterioration of international relations: Security Issues: - holding a referendum on the negotiations format to be used with the Russian Federation and on the principles for a peaceful settlement - conducting separate negotiations – without the participation of Ukraine’s Western partners – with the Russian Federation, members of the occupation authorities and their armed groups and gangs in the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, Crimea and Sevastopol - fulfilling the ultimatum requirements demanded by the aggressor state or achieving compromise with the Kremlin at the cost of making concessions to the detriment of national interests, national sovereignty, territorial integrity and order, and independent domestic and foreign policies of Ukraine [0] https://uacrisis.org/en/71966-joint-appeal-of-civil-society-representatives https://uacrisis.org/en/71966-joint-appeal-of-civil-society-...
        dismalaf 1y ago
        Yes, they made that statement because he was thought to be a pro-Russian candidate. Which is what I said.
        drysine 1y ago
    - nradov 1y ago
      [flagged]
- constantcrying 1y ago
  >Energy prices in Europe went up because US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. No, it didn't. Prices went up because Germany planned to use Russian gas while it was transitioning to renewable energy. Russia decided to attack Ukraine though and made that impossible. >Everybody who really wants knows which country benefited the most from the Nordstream pipeline being destroyed. Ukraine obviously, who now had an insurance that a deal between Germany and Russia was impossible.
- whatevaa 1y ago
  Nice propaganda.

xiphias2 1y ago

Energy prices in Europe went up because US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. Everybody who really wants knows which country benefited the most from the Nordstream pipeline being destroyed. Of course I agree with all the other points that you have made, but at least this part wasn't just Brussels administration.

Isamu 1y ago
>US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. You can say Russia. And there are also EU citizens who are not happy about the war in Europe and want to sanction Russia, but sure nobody wants to pay for that.
- selivanovp 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - constantcrying 1y ago
    [flagged]
  - dismalaf 1y ago
    Even if you believe this line of propaganda, Zelenskyy is not who was brought to power in 2015. That was Poroshenko. I don't know if you followed Ukrainian politics when Zelenskyy was elected, but Zelenskyy is a native Russian-speaker (he consciously refuses to speak Russian now) who was accused of being pro-Russia by Poroshenko and the Orange Revolution politicians, and basically only became anti-Russia when he tried negotiating the end of the conflict in Donbass/Luhansk and then of course, when Russia fully invaded...
    - drysine 1y ago
      >basically only became anti-Russia when he tried negotiating the end of the conflict in Donbass/Luhansk and then of course, when Russia fully invaded Here are "NGO"s threatening Zelensky with another Maidan right after his election [0]: As civil society activists, we present a list of “red lines not to be crossed”. Should the President cross these red lines, such actions will inevitably lead to political instability in our country and the deterioration of international relations: Security Issues: - holding a referendum on the negotiations format to be used with the Russian Federation and on the principles for a peaceful settlement - conducting separate negotiations – without the participation of Ukraine’s Western partners – with the Russian Federation, members of the occupation authorities and their armed groups and gangs in the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, Crimea and Sevastopol - fulfilling the ultimatum requirements demanded by the aggressor state or achieving compromise with the Kremlin at the cost of making concessions to the detriment of national interests, national sovereignty, territorial integrity and order, and independent domestic and foreign policies of Ukraine [0] https://uacrisis.org/en/71966-joint-appeal-of-civil-society-representatives https://uacrisis.org/en/71966-joint-appeal-of-civil-society-...
      - dismalaf 1y ago
        Yes, they made that statement because he was thought to be a pro-Russian candidate. Which is what I said.
        drysine 1y ago
  - nradov 1y ago
    [flagged]
constantcrying 1y ago
>Energy prices in Europe went up because US didn't want Europe to import cheap gas from its natural neigbour continent. No, it didn't. Prices went up because Germany planned to use Russian gas while it was transitioning to renewable energy. Russia decided to attack Ukraine though and made that impossible. >Everybody who really wants knows which country benefited the most from the Nordstream pipeline being destroyed. Ukraine obviously, who now had an insurance that a deal between Germany and Russia was impossible.
whatevaa 1y ago
Nice propaganda.