4 ms·
Don't you mean "isosemantic"? Since the same concept is represented with different syntax.
by worldsayshi 1y ago
Don't you mean "isosemantic"? Since the same concept is represented with different syntax.
- alex_smart 1y agoSure
- worldsayshi 1y agoI point it out because I think the distinction is interesting. Can we build tools that helps us work with the boundary between isosemantic and isomorphic? Like any two things that are isosemantic should be translatable between each other. And so it represents an opportunity to make the things isomorphic.